Showing posts with label Cardamine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cardamine. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

More on Milk Maids

While taking pictures of a Trillium at the edge of the woods at my house,I noticed the multitude of Cardamine californica popping up all over the place. They looked like the normal variety, so I thought I ought to take some pics to demonstrate the difference between these and the ones from my other post. Also, an especially purple Cardamine basal leaf caught my eye and wanted its picture taken (above). The heart shaped basal leaf of the milkmaid plant looks totally different from the cauline leaves, which are usually palmately dissected. They are often various shades of green or purple, or both. Below is the whole plant.



So the question is, dear readers, do the individuals in the photos from my other post belong to a subspecies or variety of Cardamine californica? If I had dear readers, I would ask for their input.


The photos above were taken on March 14 in Little River, Ca.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

First of the Forest Flowers

Milk maids (Cardamine californica) are a kind of bittercress, or toothwort - they're in the mustard family. They spring early, and are common in shady woods. Some Cardamine species are garden pests and are hard to control because their prolific dehiscent fruits spew seeds efficiently. Milk maids quickly become so ubiquitous in the early spring you stop noticing them. But notice them, because they're interesting: the variation in flower color and leaf shape is wide - at least in this area where I was photographing. These photos were taken today by a forest road in the Juan Creek watershed north of Fort Bragg. They're all within a 10 meter radius of one another yet all so different. (Perhaps different variations, but I think they're all C. Californica.)

And now for a photography note - a demo of the beauty of depth of field in creating different effects with the same subject. The one of the left is shot at f/5.6 and the other is at f/11 (both at 135 mm). They're hand held and the light was low, so the second shot had to be taken at a higher ISO (from 125 up to 800). Anyway, my point is just that both are lovely images but the depth of field gives each shot its own personality. The shallower DOF photo on the left is pretty, and kind of dramatic, but the one on the right has more detail throughout, calling attention to the whole plant, not just the flowers. I couldn't decide which effect was important now, hence the side by side.


There were other early blooms today: salmonberry, violet, coltsfoot, manzanita, iris. But I'll save those for later....